After Kind had been deployed to the handling director of the management of the Mommy Association of Hanover 96 e.V. at the end of July after a year-long conflict, he was lawfully against it and also had success before the Hanover Regional Court. Against this judgment, the e.V. leadership made an objection to the Greater Regional Court in Cell, yet this seems to have long shot of success.
- Greater Regional Court adheres to the regional court
- 50 +1 concern is not the topic of the procedure
As the OLD spokesperson Andreas Kepler announced to the Hannoversche Allegiance Dating on Monday, the Senate thinks about the interest be unfounded according to its provisional evaluation.
Greater Regional Court adheres to the regional court
The legal disagreement takes care of the managing supervisor post of Hanover 96 Management GmbH, which according to the social contract the supervisory board of this GmbH is only permitted to establish the supervisory board with two reps on the club and resources side.
A final judgment of the Higher Regional Court will just be made after October 17th. Till then, the club side still has the opportunity to deliver brand-new factors for youngster dismissal as part of a justification period.
The district court had made a decision that the EV. This currently seems to be the initial evaluation of the Greater Regional Court.
50 +1 concern is not the topic of the procedure
It needs to be emphasized that the treatment is solely about the legitimacy of kid dismissal and also not regarding the concern of whether the partnership contract may go against the concept of 50 +1 rule, which in German specialist football in such instances is a right to issue guidelines from the normal association in the direction of outside Prescribes capitalists. This is not the topic of this procedure.